Writing a review article - Are you making these mistakes?
نویسنده
چکیده
An explosion of scientific publications over the last decades has increased the need for review articles: Carefully crafted scientific review articles can provide the novice reader with an overview of a new subject and provide the expert with a synthesis of scientific evidence, proof of reproducibility of published data and pooled estimates of common truth through meta-analyses. Unfortunately, while there are ample presentations and published guidelines for the preparation of scientific articles available, detailed information about how to properly prepare scientific review articles is relatively scarce. This perspective summarizes possible mistakes that can lead to misinformation in scientific review articles with the goal to help authors to improve the scientific contribution of their review article and thereby, increase the respective value of these articles for the scientific community.
منابع مشابه
UNIX Writing Tools Primer for CS Graduate Students : Ispell , L A TEX
As graduate students in computer science at Ohio University, you will be expected to write reports for classes, conference papers, journal papers, theses or dissertations. It is expected that such documents will be well written and carefully prepared. Writing well is a difficult task, even for those of us with many years of experience. It can be even more difficult to prepare professional looki...
متن کاملAuthor’s response to reviews Title: Socioeconomic and Environmental Determinants of Under-Five Mortality in Gamo Gofa Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A matched case control study Authors:
(1) You should have your manuscript reviewed by someone who is fluent in English. If you would like professional help in revising this manuscript, you can use any reputable English language editing service. We can recommend our affiliates Nature Research Editing Service (http://bit.ly/NRES_BS) and American Journal Experts (http://bit.ly/AJE_BS) for help with English usage. Please note that use ...
متن کاملPeer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers
The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...
متن کاملمرور سیستماتیک “Systematic Review” چیست وچگونه نگاشته میشود؟
Abstract Background: Successful clinical decisions are the outcome of a complex process. In making them, we draw on information from scientific evidences, our personal experience and external rules and constraints. Considering that the explosive increase in the amount and quality of the scientific evidence that has come from both the laboratory bench and the bedside, we may lack the time, mo...
متن کاملMechanism Micues to Avoid: Common Mistakes Students Make When Writing Mechanisms
Throughout this course arrow pushing is used to indicate the flow of electrons in the various organic reaction mechanisms that are discussed. A few simple rules for properly performing arrow pushing were introduced in Section 6.2. In this Appendix we examine some of the most common mistakes that students make when first learning arrow-pushing methods and tell you how to avoid them. The mistakes...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2018